What is the treatments for allergies
American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology
This academy’s website provides valuable information to assist readers determine the difference between colds, allergies, and sinusitis. A primer guide on sinusitis also provides more specific information about the chronic version of the illness. Additional resources include a «virtual allergist» that helps you to review your symptoms, as well as a database on pollen counts.
American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (ACAAI)
In addition to providing a comprehensive guide on sinus infections, the ACAAI website also contains a wealth of information on allergies, asthma, and immunology.
The site’s useful tools include a symptom checker, a way to search for an allergist in your area, and a function that allows you to ask an allergist questions about your symptoms.
Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America (AAFA)
For allergy sufferers, the AAFA website contains an easy-to-understand primer on sinusitis. It also provides comprehensive information on various types of allergies, including those with risk factors for sinusitis.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
The CDC website provides basic information on sinus infections and other respiratory illnesses, such as common colds, bronchitis, ear infections, flu, and sore throat.
It offers guidance on how to get symptom relief for those illnesses, as well as preventative tips on practicing good hand hygiene, and a recommended immunization schedule.
U.S. National Library of Medicine
The U.S. National Library of Medicine is the world’s largest biomedical library. As part of the National Institutes of Health, their website provides the basics on sinus infection. It also contains a number of links to join you with more information on treatments, diagnostic procedures, and related issues.
How to Stay Healthy, Breathe Easier, and Feel Energetic This Winter
Indoor allergies, freezing weather, less sunlight — winter can make it hard to stay well mentally and physically.
Discover out how to protect yourself against seasonal allergies, the winter blahs, freezing winds, comfort-eating traps, and fatigue this year.
Learn More About the Ultimate Winter Wellness Guide
Sinusitis can be a confusing thing to treat for anyone. Because a sinus infection can be so easily confused with a common freezing or an allergy, figuring out the best way to alleviate your symptoms can be difficult.
Even more challenging, a sinus infection can evolve over time from a viral infection to a bacterial infection, or even from a short-term acute infection to a long-term chronic illness.
We own provided for you the best sources of information on sinus infections to assist you rapidly define your ailment and get the best and most efficient treatment possible.
About Adil S.
Dr. Adil Zahiruddin joined Allergy & ENT Associates in August 2018. He is Board Certified in Allergy and Immunology, as well as Internal Medicine. He is a member of the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. Dr. Zahiruddin has special interests in asthma and sinusitis; allergies including hay fever, food allergies, angioedema, and anaphylaxis; skin conditions including eczema, hives, and contact dermatitis; and both acquired and inherited immunodeficiencies.
Zahiruddin was born and grew up in Houston, Texas.
He graduated cum laude from Union College with a bachelor of science degree in biology and economics. He graduated from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School. He completed Internal Medicine residency at Baylor College of Medicine, followed by Allergy and Immunology fellowship at University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, where he served as chief fellow.
Dr. Zahiruddin is committed to partnering with his patients to discover individual treatment options using evidence based medicine and the latest advancements in the field. He enjoys exploring Houston restaurants, as well as traveling with his wife and two sons.
Robert S. Call, M.D.received his allergy training at the University of Virginia and remained on staff as an Instructor in Medicine for 2 years teaching and researching Asthma before moving to Richmond. Prior to his fellowship in Allergy, he did his Internal Medicine training at Michigan State University, Grand Rapids Campus. He is a Graduate of University of Virginia’s Medical School and School of Arts and Sciences where he received an MD and a BA in Biology.
Call practices full time treating adults and children with allergies. His special interests include food allergy and exercise induced asthma. He also owns and is President of Clinical Research Partners(CRP), a clinical trial company. CRP performs clinical trials in allergy and other internal medicine related areas. In 2005, he was appointed by the Governor of Virginia to the Commonwealth Health Research Board (CHRB) and was the Chair until 2015. CHRB provides funding to universities, hospitals and other facilities throughout the State of Virginia for research projects that benefit the citizens of Virginia.
Previously, Dr. Call served as the President of the Allergy and Asthma Society of Virginia, a 2 year post, and as President and Chairman of the Board of the Richmond Academy of Medicine.
Call’s favorite thing to do exterior of allergy is spending time with his wife, Mary, and his 4 lovely daughters.
Meet Our Staff
For several years running, Dr. Call has been named a Top Doc by Richmond Magazine.
Dr. Marc McMorris grew up on a farm in northcentral Pennsylvania. He received his medical degree from Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia in 1985. He came to the University of Michigan for his pediatric residency and served a Chief Resident from 1988-1989.
Following 3 years as a pediatric ER attending he returned to the University of Michigan and completed his Allergy and Immunology fellowship in 1994. Families love Dr. McMorris ability to hear with sensitivity, and they appreciate his tender approach to children. For 3 years, Dr. McMorris served as Medical Advisor for Food Anaphylaxis Education, Inc., a nonprofit Michigan education organization before becoming Director of the University of Michigan Food Allergy Service. The Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network of Virginia awarded him the Muriel C.
Furlong Award for making a difference. He has been recognized as one of the University of Michigan Health Systems Top 100 Physicians, received the University of Michigan Department of Pediatrics Top 10% Faculty Teaching Award and was inducted into the University of Michigan Department of Medicine Clinical Excellence Society in 2013. He volunteers for food allergy educational activities for Michigan families, schools, places of worship, professional organizations and health care providers.
He has participated in research evaluating anaphylaxis care, school readiness for students with food allergies, self-reported reactions to peanut and tree nuts, and the impact of food allergies on quality of life for families with food allergies. He is considered an expert in every aspects of food allergies. He currently serves as Medical Director for the Dominos Farms Allergy Specialty Clinic/Food Allergy Clinic and Clinical Service Chief for the Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
Favorite Resources for Finding a Specialist
American Rhinologic Society
Through research, education, and advocacy, the American Rhinologic Society is devoted to serving patients with nose, sinus, and skull base disorders.
Their website’s thorough coverage of sinus-related issues includes rarer conditions, such as fungal sinusitis, which are often excluded from other informational sites. It also provides a valuable search tool to discover a doctor, as well as links to other medical societies and resources that are useful for patients.
Their website contains an exhaustive guide on sinusitis and an easy-to-use «Find a Doctor» search tool.
ENThealth provides useful information on how the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) are all connected, along with information about sinusitis and other related illnesses and symptoms, such as rhinitis, deviated septum, and postnasal drip.
As part of the American Academy of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery, this website is equipped with the ability to assist you discover an ENT specialist in your area.
Last Saturday, a day after the opening of “Peter Rabbit,” Will Gluck’s new and free adaptation of Beatrix Potter’s stories, Kenneth Mendez, the president and C.E.O. of the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, issued both a statement on and an open letter criticizing the film’s makers and its studio, Sony, for one specific scene.
In that scene, Peter and the four other rabbits, who are being threatened and pursued by Tom McGregor (the heir to the venerable Mr. McGregor’s garden), adopt a new strategy to fight him: knowing that he’s allergic to blackberries, they use a slingshot to shoot blackberries at him, and one goes directly into his open mouth. He begins to choke, feels an anaphylactic episode coming on, reaches into his pocket for his EpiPen, injects himself with it, and keels over in exhaustion.
The Asthma and Allergy Foundation criticized the filmmakers for making light of a life-threatening allergy and for depicting the use of an allergen as a weapon against a gravely allergic person.
The statement warned that the movie could be “disturbing” to children with serious allergies; some people advocated a boycott. In response, Sony offered an apology. As a parent of children with severe food allergies, I wish I’d seen the movie before the controversy broke out, because I’d be curious to see whether I would own reacted strongly to the scene without having been alerted to it beforehand.
Under the given circumstances, I found that I consent that the scene spotlights an unpleasant insensitivity, even an ugly obliviousness, on the part of the filmmakers. Yet, even more, it throws into sharp relief the over-all tone and import of the film, and, in the process, reveals other peculiarities that make “Peter Rabbit” exemplary of recent movies and of the times.
“Peter Rabbit” is a boisterous comedy in which live action (human characters in realistic homes, landscapes, and towns) is blended with C.G.I. as seamlessly and as persuasively as in “Paddington 2.” The film was made by a comedy director (Gluck directed “Easy A” and “Friends with Benefits”) who, in the script, which he co-wrote with Rob Lieber, has taken extreme liberties with Potter’s stories.
Peter and his family live in a hollow beneath a tree in rural Windermere, England, and gleefully filch produce from the garden of their nemesis, the elderly Mr. McGregor. When Mr. McGregor suddenly dies, the home and garden are inherited by his great-nephew Tom (Domhnall Gleeson), a Londoner and a tidy freak who is even more hostile to the rabbits than Mr.
McGregor was. But his battles against them are inhibited when he makes the acquaintance of his neighbor Bea (Rose Byrne), an artist who is the rabbits’ defender and protector (and also their portraitist). Bea and Tom drop in love; knowing that Bea also loves the rabbits—and, especially, their ringleader and brightest personality, Peter—Tom has to do his rabbit hunting on the sly.
Peter and the other rabbits take advantage of Tom’s self-enforced restraint to run rampage through his garden and make his life miserable; Tom, for his part, stealthily takes increasingly forceful action against them. That’s when, facing genuine harm, the rabbits prepare to unleash the blackberry attack, knowing full well its potential consequences.
Peter calls it “the endgame.” For that matter, a bit earlier, as they plan the attack, the other rabbits are hesitant; Peter’s mild-mannered cousin Benjamin says that “allergies are serious” and adds, “I don’t desire to get any letters.” (The line wasn’t inserted into the movie after the controversy arose; it was always there.)
What’s peculiar about “Peter Rabbit” is that, along with its quippy, often self-referential humor and plentiful (often clever) visual gags, it features an unusual quantity and degree of violence, which link it to classic-era Looney Tunes cartoons and Three Stooges shorts. When the elderly Mr.
McGregor keels over, Peter examines him by poking his eyeball—and, after declaring him dead, gleefully takes credit for killing him. (Mr. McGregor actually died of a heart attack.) Tom comes slamming at the rabbits with rakes, hoes, and other garden tools. He installs an electric fence against the animal intruders, only to own the rabbits rewire it, electrifying his doorknobs with shocks that blast him, cannonball-like, against hard rock walls. The rabbits plant snapping traps and rakes around Tom’s bed, leading to pinchings and clobberings; they leave various fruits on staircase landings, sending Tom tumbling below.
There’s a repeated gag in which one of the sisters enjoys taking a hard drop and breaking one rib after another, and a climactic bit, involving dynamite, that’s almost apocalyptic.
In another sense, though, the tale owes nothing to the action-heavy, character-thin antics of Bugs Rabbit or Daffy Duck, Elmer Fudd or Road Runner and Wile E. Coyote. Rather, Gluck’s “Peter Rabbit” is thoroughly composed and intricately characterized; the rabbits, no less than the humans, are given elaborate backstories and large emotional arcs that the plot is devoted, at length, to illustrating, explicating, and resolving. Peter and his sisters—Flopsy, Mopsy, and Cottontail—are orphans; their dad was killed and eaten by Mr.
McGregor, and Peter’s familiar blue jacket is actually his father’s. Their mom died, too, making Bea is the closest thing to a parent that the rabbits have.
Meanwhile, Peter is a mischievous, temperamental, vain, proud hothead, who, in a silent moment, acknowledges that it’s his “character flaw” to do “stupid and reckless” things. (Oddly enough—or perhaps not oddly at every, given that the movie is written by two men—Bea is given the least backstory.) When romance blooms between Bea and Tom, Peter’s response is partly one of a practical worry for the rabbits’ safety.
But, as the violence ramps up between Tom and Peter, even Benjamin wonders whether Peter has an ulterior motive—jealousy. In other words, with Bea as Peter’s virtual mom, “Peter Rabbit” is something of a tale about Peter trying to come to terms with a stepfather; the comedic drama links Peter’s mean streak to his emotional deprivation and trauma, and it takes him carefully through the paces of his rise to self-recognition and maturity.
It is precisely this strain of emotional realism that makes the allergy subplot, slight though it is, so repellent.
The movie’s other varieties of violence are exaggerated, cartoonish, not just in depiction but in substance. Few kids own experience with electrical engineering or own dynamite at home; most kids know other kids with severe allergies. (Despite its explosive extremes and intricate, Rube Goldberg-esque calculation, there are no guns and no knives; Gluck clearly knows that certain things aren’t to be trifled with.) Meanwhile, the same emotional realism turns “Peter Rabbit” didactic, dutiful, tedious. Its mechanistic moralism, seemingly distilled from screenwriting classes and studio notes, is the sort that marks so numerous movies now—ones for adults as well as those for children—imparting values in the form of equation-like talking points, which prepare viewers not for life but for more, and similarly narrow, viewing.
Gluck clearly relishes the slapstick action that the characters incite, the situations inspire, and the technology enables, and he invests it with his own sense of exuberant discovery, which is minor but authentic.
When it comes to life lessons, however, he dons his official cap and, far from doing any learning in the course of the action, merely dispenses the official line. That’s why the scene involving a life-threatening allergy is every the more conspicuous: while the relax of the movie marches in lockstep with its edifying narrative, that scene is out of put. It doesn’t follow the script.