What does a food allergy blood test test for

A limitation of allergy blood tests is that there is no gold-standard test for numerous allergic conditions. (Double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge testing has been proposed as the gold-standard test for food allergy, and nasal allergen provocation challenge has been proposed for allergic rhinitis.)

Also, allergy blood tests can give false-positive results because of nonspecific binding of antibody in the assay.

Of note: evidence of sensitization to a specific allergen (ie, a positive blood test result) is not synonymous with clinically relevant disease (ie, clinical sensitivity).

Conversely, these tests can give false-negative results in patients who own true IgE-mediated disease as confirmed by skin testing or allergen challenge.

What does a food allergy blood test test for

The sensitivity of blood allergy testing is approximately 25% to 30% lower than that of skin testing, based on comparative studies.2 The blood tests are generally considered positive if the allergen-specific IgE level is greater than 0.35 kU/L; however, sensitization to certain inhalant allergens can happen at levels as low as 0.12 kU/L.14

Specific IgE levels measured by diverse commercial assays are not always interchangeable or equivalent, so a clinician should consistently select the same immunoassay if possible when assessing any given patient over time.15

Levels of specific IgE own been shown to depend on age, allergen specificity, entire serum IgE, and, with inhalant allergens, the season of the year.15,16

Other limitations of blood testing are its cost and a delay of several days to a week in obtaining the results.17

The allergy evaluation should start with a thorough history to glance for possible triggers for the patient’s symptoms.

For example, respiratory conditions such as asthma and rhinitis may be exacerbated during specific times of the year when certain pollens are commonly present.

For patients with this pattern, blood testing for allergy to common inhalants, including pollens, may be appropriate. Similarly, peanut allergy evaluation is indicated for a kid who has suffered an anaphylactic reaction after consuming peanut butter. Blood testing is also indicated in patients with a history of venom anaphylaxis, especially if venom skin testing was negative.

In cases in which the patient does not own a clear history of sensitization, blood testing for allergy to multiple foods may discover evidence of sensitization that does not necessarily correlate with clinical disease.18

Likewise, blood tests are not likely to be clinically relevant in conditions not mediated by IgE, such as food intolerances (eg, lactose intolerance), celiac disease, the DRESS syndrome (drug rash, eosinophilia, and systemic symptoms), Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or other types of drug hypersensitivity reactions, such as serum sickness.3

Tests for allergy to hundreds of substances are available.

Foods

Milk, eggs, soy, wheat, peanuts, tree nuts, fish, and shellfish account for most cases of food allergy in the United States.18

IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to milk, eggs, and peanuts tends to be more common in children, whereas peanuts, tree nuts, fish, and shellfish are more commonly associated with reactions in adults.18 Children are more likely to outgrow allergy to milk, soy, wheat, and eggs than allergy to peanuts, tree nuts, fish, and shellfish—only about 20% of children outgrow peanut allergy.18

Patients with an IgE-mediated reaction to foods should be closely followed by a specialist, who can best assist determine the appropriateness of additional testing (such as an oral challenge under observation), avoidance recommendations, and the introduction of foods back into the diet.19

Specific IgE tests for allergy to a variety of foods are available and can be extremely useful for diagnosis when used in the appropriate setting.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies own established a relationship between quantitative levels of specific IgE and the 95% likelihood of experiencing a subsequent clinical reaction upon exposure to that allergen.

One of the most frequently cited studies is summarized in Table 1.7,8,18 In numerous of these studies the gold standard for food allergy was a positive double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge. Of note, these values predict the likelihood of a clinical reaction but not necessarily its severity.

One caveat about these studies is that numerous were initially performed in children with a history of food allergy, numerous of whom had atopic dermatitis, and the findings own not been systematically reexamined in larger studies in more heterogeneous populations.

For example, at least eight studies tried to identify a diagnostic IgE level for cow’s milk allergy.

The 95% confidence intervals varied widely, depending on the study design, the age of the study population, the prevalence of food allergy in the population, and the statistical method used for analysis.5 For most other foods for which blood tests are available, few studies own been performed to establish predictive values similar to those in Table 1.

Thus, slight elevations in antigen-specific IgE (> 0.35 kU/L) may correlate only with in vitro sensitization in a patient who has no clinical reactivity upon oral exposure to a specific antigen.

Broad food panels own been shown to own false-positive rates higher than 50%—ie, in more than half of cases, positive results own no clinical relevance.

Therefore, these large food panels should not be used for screening.19 Instead, it is recommended that tests be limited to relevant foods based on the patient’s history when evaluating symptoms consistent with an IgE-mediated reaction to a specific food.

Food-specific IgE evaluation is also not helpful in evaluating non-IgE adverse reactions to foods (eg, intolerances).

Therefore, the patient’s history remains the most significant tool for evaluation of food allergy.

In cases in which the patient’s history suggests a food-associated IgE-mediated reaction and the blood test is negative, the patient should be referred to a specialist for skin testing with commercial extracts or even unused food extracts, given the higher sensitivity of in vivo testing.20

How do doctors test for food allergies?
Debra

Doctors often use a combination of skin testing and blood testing to diagnose a food allergy.

One common skin test is a scratch test. For this test, a doctor or nurse will scratch the skin with a tiny bit of liquid extract of an allergen (such as pollen or food).

Allergists generally do skin tests on a person’s forearm or back. The allergist then waits 15 minutes or so to see if reddish, raised spots (called wheals) form, indicating an allergy.

If the doctor thinks someone might be allergic to more than one thing — or if it’s not clear what’s triggering a person’s allergy — the allergist will probably skin test for several diverse allergens at the same time.

When a skin test shows up as positive with a certain food, that only means a person mightbe allergic to that food. In these cases, doctors may desire to do additional testing.

To diagnose a food allergy for certain, an allergist might do a blood test in addition to skin testing.

This involves taking a little blood sample to send to a laboratory for analysis. The lab checks the blood for IgE antibodies to specific foods. If enough IgE antibodies to a specific food arein the blood, it’s extremely likely that the person is allergic to it.

If the results of the skin and blood tests are still unclear, though, an allergist might do something called a food challenge. During this test, the person is given gradually increasing amounts of the potential food allergen to eat while the doctor watches for symptoms.

Skin tests may itch for a while.

If your childundergoes one, the allergist might give you an antihistamine or steroid cream for your kid to useafter the test to lessen the itching.

Allergy Tests

When you need them and when you don’t

Allergy tests may assist discover allergies to things you eat, touch, or breathe in. They are generally skin or blood tests.

However, allergy tests alone are generally not enough. It is significant to own a doctor’s exam and medical history first to assist diagnose allergies.

What does a food allergy blood test test for

If the exam and medical history point to allergies, allergy tests may assist discover what you are allergic to. But if you don’t own symptoms and you haven’t had a medical exam that points to an allergy, you should ponder twice about allergy testing. Here’s why:

The incorrect test can be a waste of money.

Allergy tests can cost a lot. A skin allergy test can cost $60 to $300. A blood test can cost $200 to $1,000. A blood test for food allergies can cost hundreds of dollars, and testing for chronic hives can cost thousands of dollars. Your health insurance may not cover the costs of these tests.

And without a doctor’s exam, the test may not even tell you what is causing your symptoms or how to treat them.

Allergy tests, without a doctor’s exam, generally are not reliable.

Many drugstores and supermarkets offer free screenings. And you can even purchase kits to test for allergies yourself at home. But the results of these tests may be misleading.

  1. The tests may tell you own an allergy when you do not. This is called a “false positive.”
  2. These free tests and home tests for food allergies are not always reliable.

Unreliable test results can lead to unnecessary changes in your lifestyle.

If the test says you are allergic to some foods, such as wheat, soy, eggs, or milk, you may stop eating those foods.

You may finish up with a poor diet, unnecessary worries and frustration, or additional food costs. If the test says you are allergic to cats or dogs, you may give up a loved pet.

And tests for chronic hives—red, itchy, raised areas of the skin that final for more than six weeks—can show something that may not glance normal but is not a problem. However, this can lead to anxiety, more tests, and referrals to specialists.

So, when should you own allergy tests?

If you own allergy symptoms, you may get relief from self-help steps and over-the-counter drugs. If these steps do not assist your symptoms, then it is time to see your doctor.

The doctor should enquire you about your medical history and make certain you get the correct tests.

If your medical history suggests that you own an allergy, your doctor might refer you to an allergist or immunologist (doctors who specialize in allergies) for testing.

  1. A skin test is the most common helpful of allergy test. Your skin is pricked with a needle that has a tiny quantity of something you might be allergic to.
  2. Specific IgE (sIgE) Blood Testing (previously and commonly referred to as RAST or ImmunoCAP testing): This test measures levels of specific IgE directed towards foods in the blood.

    The range, depending upon the laboratory techniques, can go from 0.10 kU/L to 100 kU/L. This also has a extremely high negative predictive worth but a low positive predictive worth. Mildly elevated results are often encountered, especially in children who own other types of allergic conditions such as eczema, asthma, and allergic rhinitis. The predictive values for likelihood of an allergy being present differ with every food, but in general, the higher the level, the more likely that an IgE mediated allergy is present.

    This is also a extremely poor screening test due to the high rates of falsely elevated and meaningless results.

    I’ve met numerous families whose children own been ‘screened for food allergies’ in the setting of eczema or other conditions and the report lists every food that was tested as being ‘high’, as their cutoff for reporting this is often set extremely low, at levels that are generally meaningless. This leads to diagnostic confusion and unnecessary dietary elimination.

    What does a food allergy blood test test for

    In addition, numerous laboratories will report an arbitrary class designation (a created worth that is assigned to a result that has no meaning or scientific basis), along with the actual level of specific IgE obtained. This is of no clinical use and also does not assist determine whether food allergy is present. It is also commonly misunderstood that higher blood test levels indicate increased ”severity”. Unfortunately there is no test that can determine severity. Individuals with higher blood (or skin) tests are at no more increased risk of anaphylaxis than someone with minimally positive tests.

    TAKE NOTE: «Class Levels» are meaningless.

  3. Allergy – This is an immune response to a specific food.

    Symptoms should happen every time that food is ingested. These immune system changes drop into two categories: Immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated and non-IgE-mediated.

  4. If you own a rash or take a medicine that could affect the results of a skin test, you may need a blood test.
  5. For chronic hives, you generally do not need an allergy test. However, your doctor might order tests to make certain that the hives are not caused by other conditions, such as a thyroid disorder.
  6. Sensitivity or intolerance – This is a non-immunologic response to a certain food or foods.

    Symptoms happen when that food is consumed, but may be variable over time. This also most often includes gastrointestinal symptoms and does not include symptoms observed with IgE mediated reactions. Skin prick or blood specific IgE testing is negative.

  7. IgE mediated hypersensitivity/allergy – Commonly referred to as “food allergy”, in which IgE antibody specific for a food is formed and attaches to the allergy cells throughout the body. Whenever that food is ingested, it causes immediate onset symptoms, generally within minutes or up to 3 hours after ingestion.

    Typical symptoms include hives, swelling, itchy/water nose and eyes, difficulty breathing/swallowing, vomiting, and can progress to loss of consciousness. Skin prick or blood specific IgE testing is extremely likely to be positive for that food.

  8. Skin Prick Testing (SPT): This involves placing a drop of allergen onto the surface of the skin, and then pricking through it to introduce the allergen into the top layer of the skin. If specific IgE antibody towards that allergen is present and attached to the allergy cells, then an itchy bump and surrounding redness (wheal/flare) should develop within 15 minutes.

    These tests own a high negative predictive worth (when a test yields a negative result, it is extremely likely to be correct), but a low positive predictive worth (when a test yields a positive result, it is less likely to be correct) which can result in untrue positive test results. Thus, it is not a excellent screening tool but is a extremely dependable test to confirm a history that is consistent with an IgE mediated food allergy.
    In order to get precise results, every antihistamines should be discontinued for 5-7 days before testing.

    A common myth is that skin prick testing is not dependable in young infants and children. Actually, skin prick testing to foods is dependable at any age if you own a history of IgE mediated food allergy. Tests may be negative in young children when they are performed for other conditions such as non-IgE mediated formula or food intolerance.

  9. Non-IgE mediated reaction – This is an immunologically mediated, typically delayed-onset reaction to a specific food.

    This is mediated by other parts of the immune system separate from IgE, specifically T-cells. These symptoms are not immediate in onset and can happen hours to days after ingestion. Anaphylaxis is not part of this response and most symptoms involve the gastrointestinal tract, with vomiting, upset stomach, diarrhea, or blood in the stool. Skin prick or blood specific IgE testing is negative.

  10. Anaphylaxis – Rapid onset, progressive, severe symptoms involving more than one organ system that can happen with IgE mediated food allergy.
  11. Sensitization – This is the detection of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) through skin prick or blood testing towards a specific food, but without the development of symptoms after that food is ingested.

    What does a food allergy blood test test for

    In other words, a positive allergy test result to a food that your kid has eaten without any problems, or has never eaten.

  12. Physician Supervised Oral Food Challenge (commonly referred to as IOFC on KFA):This entails consumption of gradually increasing amounts of the suspected food allergen while being supervised by a physician, generally an Allergist. If no symptoms develop that are consistent with an IgE mediated food allergy (hives, swelling, anaphylaxis), then it makes the presence of IgE directed toward that food unlikely.

    This is often considered the gold standard for food allergy testing, and can be considered a excellent way to ‘rule out’ food allergy or determine if a previously diagnosed food allergy has gone away. This is time consuming as most challenges take 4-8 hours to finish but can be a extremely dependable test.

    TAKE NOTE: The gold standard for diagnosing a food allergy is through a physician-supervised oral food challenge.

This report is for you to use when talking with your healthcare provider.

It is not a substitute for medical advice and treatment. Use of this report is at your own risk.

© 2016 Consumer Reports. Developed in cooperation with the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.

07/2012

09 May Skin Test vs. Blood Test: Which Test is Better?

Posted at 21:05h in Skin Test by mcgallergy18

It’s the peak of allergy season, and allergens are everywhere.

What does a food allergy blood test test for

This is the time of the year that you see your symptoms worsen. They may even get so bad that you need to see a doctor.

Allergy specialists use testing to determine the environmental factors or foods that a patient is allergic to. Typically, allergists use skin testing or blood testing as their diagnostic procedure, but this leaves numerous patients wondering which type of testing is better. The short answer is, each test has its own advantages and limitations.

How are Blood Tests and Skin Tests Similar?

Both blood and skin tests work to diagnose allergens by detecting antibodies known as Immunoglobulin E (IgE).

IgE’s live in a patient’s blood and skin, recognize allergens and trigger an allergic response, allowing the physician to determine what factors are making the patient’s symptoms flare up. Blood tests detect IgE in the blood, while skin tests detect IgE on the skin.

Advantages of Skin Tests

Generally speaking, skin tests are more sensitive than blood tests, meaning they are more likely to detect allergies that a blood test may miss. Skin tests also require less wait time, as results are typically delivered in 15-20 minutes, rather than the one to two week wait time of blood tests. Skin testing also allows physicians to select a wider range of allergens.

For example, at McGovern Allergy and Asthma Clinic, physicians own access to over 150 diverse environmental and food allergens, allowing them to test for unusual types of allergies. Blood tests are limited by what allergens laboratories test for—which is generally a much smaller quantity than skin tests. Lastly, skin testing is much less expensive than a blood test.

Advantages of Blood Tests

While skin testing may seem love the way to go, there are advantages to blood testing that skin testing simply cannot provide. Skin tests require patients to stop taking anti-histamines five to seven days prior to their test. This is because anti-histamine medications make skin less reactive.

Blood tests, however, are not affected by medication. Patients with severe allergies who cannot stop taking medication can benefit from continuing their medication while undergoing a blood test. Additionally, patients with sensitive skin (dermatographia) or hives, can produce untrue positive results on a skin test, reducing the test’s reliability.

Furthermore, patients with eczema or those with severe allergic reactions are also better candidates for blood testing. Lastly, blood testing allows for component testing in food allergies, meaning the test can actually determine the exact proteins in food that a patient is allergic too, and can even predict the severity of his or her allergic reaction.

Which is Better?

There really is no one-size-fits-all allergy test. Your best bet to getting the most out of your allergy testing is to consult with an experienced allergist, love those at McGovern Allergy and Asthma Clinic. A knowledgeable and experienced allergist will determine which type of testing is best for each individual patient—taking into consideration his or her previous medical history and the advantages and limitations of each type of test. Sometimes allergists may even use both types of testing, when results from a blood or skin test aren’t definitively clear.

Contact Us

If you are experiencing allergy symptoms and are looking for relief, contact the experienced team at McGovern Allergy and Asthma Clinic today. Visit https://www.mcgovernallergy.com or call 713-661-1444 to book an appointment today.

What You Need to Know About Food Allergy Testing

by David Stukus, MD

Whenever I meet with families for the first time and enquire the parents whether their kid has any food allergies, I often hear the following reply: “I don’t know, he/she’s never been tested”. This always presents a amazing chance to discuss the role of diagnostic testing for food allergies, as I’d love to do in this forum.

Before we go any further, I’d love to define some common terms that you may encounter when reading about or discussing food allergies:

  • Allergy – This is an immune response to a specific food.

    Symptoms should happen every time that food is ingested. These immune system changes drop into two categories: Immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated and non-IgE-mediated.

  • Non-IgE mediated reaction – This is an immunologically mediated, typically delayed-onset reaction to a specific food. This is mediated by other parts of the immune system separate from IgE, specifically T-cells. These symptoms are not immediate in onset and can happen hours to days after ingestion. Anaphylaxis is not part of this response and most symptoms involve the gastrointestinal tract, with vomiting, upset stomach, diarrhea, or blood in the stool. Skin prick or blood specific IgE testing is negative.
  • Sensitization – This is the detection of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) through skin prick or blood testing towards a specific food, but without the development of symptoms after that food is ingested.

    In other words, a positive allergy test result to a food that your kid has eaten without any problems, or has never eaten.

  • IgE mediated hypersensitivity/allergy – Commonly referred to as “food allergy”, in which IgE antibody specific for a food is formed and attaches to the allergy cells throughout the body. Whenever that food is ingested, it causes immediate onset symptoms, generally within minutes or up to 3 hours after ingestion. Typical symptoms include hives, swelling, itchy/water nose and eyes, difficulty breathing/swallowing, vomiting, and can progress to loss of consciousness. Skin prick or blood specific IgE testing is extremely likely to be positive for that food.
  • Anaphylaxis – Rapid onset, progressive, severe symptoms involving more than one organ system that can happen with IgE mediated food allergy.
  • Sensitivity or intolerance – This is a non-immunologic response to a certain food or foods.

    Symptoms happen when that food is consumed, but may be variable over time. This also most often includes gastrointestinal symptoms and does not include symptoms observed with IgE mediated reactions. Skin prick or blood specific IgE testing is negative.

When trying to determine whether a kid has a food allergy, there are numerous steps involved. First, the most significant part is taking a careful history of suspected foods, the timing and types of symptoms that happen, and any treatment that has before used to assist make symptoms better.

If the history is consistent with an IgE mediated allergy, then testing is often pursued. However, a excellent law of thumb to remember is, if your kid can eat a food without developing any symptoms, then they are unlikely to be allergic to that food. Why is that?

What does a food allergy blood test test for

Because the best test is actual ingestion of the food. In regards to IgE mediated allergy, you’re almost always going to know if a certain food makes your kid ill, and there are no ‘hidden’ food allergies. In numerous circumstances, the history is more consistent with non-IgE mediated symptoms or intolerance and skin prick or specific IgE testing is not helpful, necessary, or indicated. This is the point when numerous families enquire, “Why don’t we just do the allergy tests to discover out for sure?” If only it were so easy.

Before we discuss any further, I’d love to mention something that is extremely significant to hold in mind when discussing food allergy testing.

A positive test result for food allergy is not, in and of itself, diagnostic for food allergy. These tests are best utilized to assist confirm a suspicious history for IgE mediated food allergies. They own high rates of falsely elevated and meaningless results and are not useful screening tools. Some commercial laboratories offer convenient “screening panels”, in which numerous diverse foods are included. These are rarely utilized by Allergists/Immunologists, but more commonly ordered by primary care providers.

This often results in falsely elevated results, along with diagnostic confusion and unnecessary dietary elimination. Ultimately, your kid may own food(s) removed from their diet for no reason other than a meaningless positive test result. This may then lead to anxiety, family hardship due to food avoidance, and potentially nutritional deficiencies.

There are 3 main ways to test for IgE mediated food allergy:

When trying to determine whether a kid has a food allergy, there are numerous steps involved.

First, the most significant part is taking a careful history of suspected foods, the timing and types of symptoms that happen, and any treatment that has before used to assist make symptoms better. If the history is consistent with an IgE mediated allergy, then testing is often pursued. However, a excellent law of thumb to remember is, if your kid can eat a food without developing any symptoms, then they are unlikely to be allergic to that food. Why is that?

Because the best test is actual ingestion of the food. In regards to IgE mediated allergy, you’re almost always going to know if a certain food makes your kid ill, and there are no ‘hidden’ food allergies. In numerous circumstances, the history is more consistent with non-IgE mediated symptoms or intolerance and skin prick or specific IgE testing is not helpful, necessary, or indicated. This is the point when numerous families enquire, “Why don’t we just do the allergy tests to discover out for sure?” If only it were so easy.

Before we discuss any further, I’d love to mention something that is extremely significant to hold in mind when discussing food allergy testing.

A positive test result for food allergy is not, in and of itself, diagnostic for food allergy. These tests are best utilized to assist confirm a suspicious history for IgE mediated food allergies. They own high rates of falsely elevated and meaningless results and are not useful screening tools. Some commercial laboratories offer convenient “screening panels”, in which numerous diverse foods are included. These are rarely utilized by Allergists/Immunologists, but more commonly ordered by primary care providers.

This often results in falsely elevated results, along with diagnostic confusion and unnecessary dietary elimination. Ultimately, your kid may own food(s) removed from their diet for no reason other than a meaningless positive test result. This may then lead to anxiety, family hardship due to food avoidance, and potentially nutritional deficiencies.

There are 3 main ways to test for IgE mediated food allergy:

    • Skin Prick Testing (SPT): This involves placing a drop of allergen onto the surface of the skin, and then pricking through it to introduce the allergen into the top layer of the skin. If specific IgE antibody towards that allergen is present and attached to the allergy cells, then an itchy bump and surrounding redness (wheal/flare) should develop within 15 minutes.

      These tests own a high negative predictive worth (when a test yields a negative result, it is extremely likely to be correct), but a low positive predictive worth (when a test yields a positive result, it is less likely to be correct) which can result in untrue positive test results. Thus, it is not a excellent screening tool but is a extremely dependable test to confirm a history that is consistent with an IgE mediated food allergy.

      In order to get precise results, every antihistamines should be discontinued for 5-7 days before testing. A common myth is that skin prick testing is not dependable in young infants and children. Actually, skin prick testing to foods is dependable at any age if you own a history of IgE mediated food allergy. Tests may be negative in young children when they are performed for other conditions such as non-IgE mediated formula or food intolerance.

  • Specific IgE (sIgE) Blood Testing (previously and commonly referred to as RAST or ImmunoCAP testing): This test measures levels of specific IgE directed towards foods in the blood.

    The range, depending upon the laboratory techniques, can go from 0.10 kU/L to 100 kU/L. This also has a extremely high negative predictive worth but a low positive predictive worth. Mildly elevated results are often encountered, especially in children who own other types of allergic conditions such as eczema, asthma, and allergic rhinitis. The predictive values for likelihood of an allergy being present differ with every food, but in general, the higher the level, the more likely that an IgE mediated allergy is present. This is also a extremely poor screening test due to the high rates of falsely elevated and meaningless results.

    I’ve met numerous families whose children own been ‘screened for food allergies’ in the setting of eczema or other conditions and the report lists every food that was tested as being ‘high’, as their cutoff for reporting this is often set extremely low, at levels that are generally meaningless.

    This leads to diagnostic confusion and unnecessary dietary elimination. In addition, numerous laboratories will report an arbitrary class designation (a created worth that is assigned to a result that has no meaning or scientific basis), along with the actual level of specific IgE obtained. This is of no clinical use and also does not assist determine whether food allergy is present. It is also commonly misunderstood that higher blood test levels indicate increased ”severity”. Unfortunately there is no test that can determine severity.

    Individuals with higher blood (or skin) tests are at no more increased risk of anaphylaxis than someone with minimally positive tests.

    TAKE NOTE: «Class Levels» are meaningless.

  • Physician Supervised Oral Food Challenge (commonly referred to as IOFC on KFA):This entails consumption of gradually increasing amounts of the suspected food allergen while being supervised by a physician, generally an Allergist. If no symptoms develop that are consistent with an IgE mediated food allergy (hives, swelling, anaphylaxis), then it makes the presence of IgE directed toward that food unlikely.

    This is often considered the gold standard for food allergy testing, and can be considered a excellent way to ‘rule out’ food allergy or determine if a previously diagnosed food allergy has gone away. This is time consuming as most challenges take 4-8 hours to finish but can be a extremely dependable test.

    TAKE NOTE: The gold standard for diagnosing a food allergy is through a physician-supervised oral food challenge.

As you can see, performing diagnostic testing for food allergies can be extremely complicated and requires careful consideration about what tests to order and how to interpret them.

There are extremely few indications to act out an extensive ‘screening panel’ for food allergies. However, obtaining a careful history of what specific foods cause symptoms and then using the type of symptoms can be a helpful guide to determine whether specific IgE testing is worth pursuing, or to go in a diverse direction.

Lastly, a expression of caution regarding other commonly used techniques (often utilized by non-board certified Allergists/Immunologists) that you may encounter. Specific IgG blood testing for foods, muscle provocation testing, acupuncture, hair/urine analysis, and applied kinesiology are not validated, standardized, or FDA approved tests for the diagnosis of food allergy or food intolerance.

Use of these tests is not recommended by the American Academy of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology, or supported by the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy, published in 2010 (Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 126(6); supplement S1-56).

References

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy, published in 2010(Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 126(6); supplement S1-56).

Dr.

What does a food allergy blood test test for

David Stukus is an Assistant Professor of Pediatrics in the Section of Allergy/Immunology at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. In addition to his interest in caring for families with food allergies and other allergic conditions, he also serves as the Director of the Complicated Asthma Clinic. He currently serves as the chair of the Medical Advisory Team for Kids With Food Allergies and sits on the Board of Directors for the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. He previously completed his residency at Nationwide Children’s Hospital and his fellowship at the Cleveland Clinic.

You can follow him on @AllergyKidsDoc.

Medical review October 2012 and April 2014.

As you can see, performing diagnostic testing for food allergies can be extremely complicated and requires careful consideration about what tests to order and how to interpret them. There are extremely few indications to act out an extensive ‘screening panel’ for food allergies. However, obtaining a careful history of what specific foods cause symptoms and then using the type of symptoms can be a helpful guide to determine whether specific IgE testing is worth pursuing, or to go in a diverse direction.

Lastly, a expression of caution regarding other commonly used techniques (often utilized by non-board certified Allergists/Immunologists) that you may encounter.

Specific IgG blood testing for foods, muscle provocation testing, acupuncture, hair/urine analysis, and applied kinesiology are not validated, standardized, or FDA approved tests for the diagnosis of food allergy or food intolerance. Use of these tests is not recommended by the American Academy of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology, or supported by the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy, published in 2010 (Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 126(6); supplement S1-56).

References

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy, published in 2010(Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 126(6); supplement S1-56).

Dr.

David Stukus is an Assistant Professor of Pediatrics in the Section of Allergy/Immunology at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. In addition to his interest in caring for families with food allergies and other allergic conditions, he also serves as the Director of the Complicated Asthma Clinic. He currently serves as the chair of the Medical Advisory Team for Kids With Food Allergies and sits on the Board of Directors for the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. He previously completed his residency at Nationwide Children’s Hospital and his fellowship at the Cleveland Clinic.

What does a food allergy blood test test for

You can follow him on @AllergyKidsDoc.

Medical review October 2012 and April 2014.


RELATED VIDEO: